A nonprofit publication of the Kentucky Center for Public Service Journalism

Commentary: Over 50 KY economists urge federal elected officials to enact carbon pricing


By Christine Cunha Missik, MD and David Anderson, PhD
 
Climate change poses a serious threat to our natural environment and to our economic prosperity. It threatens our health, our crops, our infrastructure, our way of life. Kentuckians are already experiencing the harmful effects of extreme weather events. The damage will only worsen if we do nothing to mitigate climate change.
 
Now is the time for our representatives to take action. Addressing climate change requires effective national policies guided by sound economic principles. To that end, more than 50 professors of economics and related fields from 14 Kentucky institutions, are asking Kentucky’s congressional delegation to support the following policies:
 
Impose a carbon fee

We know that carbon dioxide created during energy production and the manufacture and delivery of many goods and services leads to rising global temperatures and other harmful consequences. It is therefore prudent to curb global carbon emissions. 
 
A carbon fee offers a cost-effective lever to reduce emissions at the scale and speed necessary. It avoids the need for regulation while stimulating technological innovation and the development of carbon-efficient goods and services.
 
A carbon fee requires polluters to pay for the damage they inflict on society. When polluters are not held accountable for the harm they create, we experience a market failure. A carbon fee applies market forces to avoid the market failure by encouraging the use of cleaner energy sources and the purchase of less pollution-intensive goods.
 
Return the fee to Americans as a carbon dividend

Revenue collected under this policy should be returned as regular lump-sum payments to Americans.  A dividend program increases the policy’s fairness. Importantly, the carbon fee and dividend policy would benefit most Kentuckians and households across the US, including the most vulnerable. The majority of families would receive a larger dividend payment each year than they pay in increased energy prices and prices of other goods.
 
Create a border tax adjustment

To ensure that American companies maintain their competitiveness and are not penalized for their energy efficiency, the policy should include a border tax adjustment on imported goods. The tax would be based on the carbon emissions associated with the production of the imported goods. In addition, the border adjustment would offer rebates to US producers that export to countries without carbon fees.
 
Meeting emissions reduction targets

The policy should include emissions reduction targets and mechanisms for enforcement. The carbon fee should start low, then increase each year until we achieve these targets. A carbon fee that gradually increases over time will give firms time to adapt to the new policy while also providing a strong incentive to quickly innovate and invest in new low-carbon technologies.
 
Effective policy

We present this as effective, practical policy, which should be enacted as soon as possible.
 
David Anderson, PhD, Centre 
Maria Apostolova-Mihaylova, PhD, Centre
Sunayan Acharya, PhD, Murray State 
Adib Bagh, PhD, UK
Sarthak Behera, PhD, Centre 
Christopher Biolsi, PhD, WKU
Glenn Blomquist, PhD, UK (Emeritus)
Christopher Bollinger, PhD, UK
John Butler, PhD, UK
Jacob Byl, PhD, WKU
Yong Chao, PhD, UofL
Gary Clayton, PhD, NKU
Thomas Cooper, PhD, Georgetown 
Charles Courtemanche, PhD, UK
Thomas Creahan, PhD, Morehead State (Emeritus)
Jean Cupidon, PhD, Berea
Elham Darbandi, PhD, UK
Linda Dynan, PhD, NKU
José M. Fernández, PhD, UofL
Per G. Fredriksson, PhD, UofL
Volker Grzimek, PhD, Berea 
Seid Hassan, PhD, Murray State 
Ana María Herrera, PhD, UK
Gail Hoyt, PhD, UK
William Hoyt, PhD, UK
Bruce Johnson, PhD, Centre 
Jeffrey Johnson, PhD, Sullivan 
Yoko Kusunose, PhD, UK
Thomas E. Lambert, PhD, UofL
J. Sebastian Leguizamon, PhD, WKU
Steven Lugauer, PhD, UK
Lala Ma, PhD, UK
James McCoy, PhD, Murray State (Emeritus)
Golnaz Moti, PhD, WKU
Darshak Patel, PhD, UK
Marie Petkus, PhD, Centre 
Frank Raymond, PhD, Bellarmine 
Lynn W. Robbins, PhD, UK (Emeritus)
Malcolm Robinson, PhD, Thomas More 
Fred. J. Ruppel, PhD, EKU (Emeritus)
Jerry Skees, PhD, UK (Emeritus)
Nancy Sowers, PhD, Berea 
Scott R. Steele, PhD, Berea
Bradley A. Stevenson, PhD, Bellarmine
Kenneth Troske, PhD, UK
Abdul Turay, PhD, KSU
Caryn Vazzana, PhD, Berea 
Daniel Vazzana, PhD, Georgetown 
John Wade, PhD, EKU (Emeritus)
Mesghena Yasin, PhD, Morehead State (Emeritus)
Weihua Zhao, PhD, UofL
James Ziliak, PhD,  UK


Related Posts

One Comment

  1. Tony Potochnik says:

    Makes sense. Let’s do it. What do you say Senators McConnell and Paul? The IEA says time is running out for an orderly transition to clean energy.

Reply to Tony Potochnik Cancel Reply