A nonprofit publication of the Kentucky Center for Public Service Journalism

Weekender: What if only three horses showed up, and other tales from Derbies past


Robert-Treadway_SMALL

Editor’s note: A master storyteller – or is that master of the tall tale? – Robert Treadway loves the horses as much as he loves history. Marry the two – and it’s magic. Over the years, he has shared many of his colorful stories with KyForward readers. And now we’d like to share some of those with you:

A hundred years ago, two longshots came in –
a horse and a horse race

Longshot Donerail after winning the 1913 Kentucky Derby (Photo from Wikimedia Commons)

Longshot Donerail after winning the 1913 Kentucky Derby (Photo from Wikimedia Commons)

In 2012, when I’ll Have Another paid $32.60 to win the Kentucky Derby, I was ecstatic that a longshot had won it, proving my adage that in racing, or in life, a longshot will occasionally come in. One hundred years ago, two longshots came in, a horse and a horse race.

By 1913, the Kentucky Derby was coming up in the world as an important regional stakes race, but had not yet become the most popular American Thoroughbred race. Among classics such as Chicago’s American Derby and the rich races of the east coast, the Kentucky Derby began as a longshot, a race for 3-year-olds in an era when Thoroughbreds were thought not to mature until their fourth year and run in Louisville, a town not known for racing. The single man responsible for the shift was Col. Matt Winn, who took over Churchill Downs and the Derby in 1902 and began building.

The Kentucky Derby was in a transitional stage. The crowd at Churchill Downs on May 10, 1913, (the race would not always be run on the first Saturday in May until the 1930s), saw little of the spectacle of today’s Derby: there was no singing of My Old Kentucky Home before the running of the race and no awarding of roses afterward. But the race was also not the dusty mile-and-a-half free-for-all, run at an upstart track, that it had been in 1875.

Col. Matt Winn (Photo from Wikimedia Commons)

Col. Matt Winn (Photo from Wikimedia Commons)

The gathered multitude on that Saturday saw what few of them had come to see: the greatest upset in Derby history. Going into the race, all observers thought that the two favorites, Foundation, favorite of the Lexington crowd, would give Ten Point, a favorite of the East Coast money crowd, “the swells,” a run for his money. Some thought that one of the early fillies to run in the Derby, Gowell, also had a shot. I have read every pre-race analysis available, and have not found one turf writer who gave another Lexington-owned and bred colt, Donerail, any shot at all.

But the lead of the Daily Racing Form’s coverage of the race in its Sunday edition of May 11, 1913, told the tale:

“The uncertainty of horse racing, that element which makes the greatest of all out of doors sports so fascinating, was never more clearly demonstrated than at Churchill Downs this afternoon when Donerail won the thirty-ninth Kentucky Derby in 2:04 1/5, the fastest time in which any mile and a quarter was ever run over this famous old battle ground of the thoroughbreds, and at odds of 91.45 to 1, the longest price for any winner of this classic, which had its inaugural in 1875.”

When the crowd of 30,000 arrived, they found that Churchill Downs was fitted out with the newly introduced parimutuel machines. These machines introduced parimutuel betting, in which one effectively bets against the crowd, replacing the old system in which bets were placed with bookmakers, each of whom quoted his own odds. “It [the handle] was $272,771. There were 30 machines for $25 tickets: three for $10 tickets; seven for $5 tickets, and eighteen for $2 tickets,” the Racing Form reported. The Derby’s great marketing genius Col. Winn had introduced the $2 ticket in 1911; prior to that, the minimum parimutuel bet had been $5.

— There’s more. Click here to keep reading.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

What if they had a Derby and only
three horses showed up? It happened!

In modern times, Derbies have gone off with 15-20 entries, with rare dips below that. But what if you had a Derby and only three horses showed up? And what if two of them were owned by the same owner? And what if the winning jockey were only 15 . . .

Welcome to 1892, which gets my vote for the Kentucky Derby’s low point in history.

But by 1892, the new had worn off. Other races, such as the Preakness Stakes, then often run on the same day as the Derby, and the Belmont Stakes, often run only a few days later, had the advantage of not requiring horses in training on the east coast to be shipped west to Kentucky.

That year only three starters ran in the race, down from four starters the previous year, and six the year before that. The race is historic for another reason: the winning jockey, the great African-American rider Alonzo Clayton, became the youngest Derby-winning jockey, at age 15, a record that still stands.

In the 1890s, the Derby was on hard times. It’s hard to imagine a time when the Derby wasn’t Thoroughbred racing’s signature event, but as we have seen in previous columns, in the 1890s, the Derby was less than 20 years old, and had begun as little more than a publicity stunt — a race for 3-year-olds — to draw fans to a startup track in Louisville that wasn’t yet called Churchill Downs.

Merriwether Lewis Clark, grandson of the Clark of the Lewis and Clark expedition, and named after the Lewis, founded the Derby in 1875. Clark had a mercurial personality type and was entirely unsuited to managing a racetrack, or perhaps any other business. He sadly took his own life in 1899.

Clark had based the Derby on the English Derby, a race for 3-year-olds, in an age when the prime year of a horse’s career was his 4-year-old season. The idea of a 3-year-old race, particularly in the spring, was new and meant to attract attention. It was, in large part, a publicity stunt.

But by 1892, the new had worn off. Other races, such as the Preakness Stakes, then often run on the same day as the Derby, and the Belmont Stakes, often run only a few days later, had the advantage of not requiring horses in training on the East Coast to be shipped west to Kentucky.

It’s hard to say why 1892 became the low point. The Panic of 1893, which virtually destroyed Churchill Downs financially, was a year away, and the wave of reform that virtually killed racing in the northeast after the turn of the century was more than a decade away. Of course, this wasn’t a one-year phenomenon: with only four starters the year before, and six before that. The race hadn’t been a popular race in almost a decade; the last time the race had drawn ten starters had been in 1886, and the last time it drew 14, nearly equaling its opening day performance of 15 starters had been 1882.

The three entries in 1892 were the great runner Azra, who beat an unknown named Huron by a nose and went on to win the Travers Stakes and the Clark Handicap as a 3-year-old, and the third place horse, named Phil Dwyer, who loped in six lengths behind.

Both Huron and Phil Dwyer were owned by Ed Corrigan, about whom I don’t know much, other than that he provided two-thirds of the entries for the smallest Derby field ever. Obviously Huron, who only lost by a nose, wasn’t a bad runner on that day, despite his obscurity. It’s hard to say much in favor of Phil Dwyer, though. In a three-horse race, with the other two nose and nose at the wire, it’s hard to say you had a bad trip. And, at 2:41 1/2, for a mile and a half, it’s not like they were setting the earth on fire.

Azra was owned by Bashford Manor Stable, an up and coming Thoroughbred breeding operation founded by George J. Long in Louisville in 1887. Bashford Manor would breed and race Thoroughbreds well into the 20th century, but Azra was its only Derby winner.

He was trained by John H. Morris, one of the top trainers of his day. His regular jockey, and his Derby rider, was the great African-American jockey Alonzo Clayton, who, at age 15, made history himself.

The Derby had another decade to struggle, before salvation arrived in the form of Col. Matt Winn, the impresario who turned a publicity stunt into the modern face of Thoroughbred racing. It improved a little bit, eking along at seven and eight starters, until the late teens, when buoyed by some of Col. Winn’s own publicity stunts, the numbers began creeping up as Matt Winn’s race became America’s race. The era of three horse Derbies is long gone.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Along with producing lifelong racing fan,
Secretariat changed a life

Secretariat won the 1973 Kentucky Derby, setting a record that stands to this day. We saw the Maryland Racing Commission revise its time for the 1973 Preakness, which had been in dispute all of those years, to a time of 1:54, a record for that race as well. Secretariat’s record time in the Belmont Stakes has never been approached. In that glorious spring of 1973, Secretariat set records in all three Triple Crown races that stand to this day.

While all that was going on other places, I was 13 years old, and growing up in Heidelberg, a small community in Lee County, Kentucky, on the banks of the Kentucky River, an area not known to be a hotbed of Thoroughbred activity. Lee County is further east than Powell County, childhood home of legendary trainer Woody Stephens, and the location of a statue and monument in his honor, a marker I have identified earlier as the only monument or marker concerning the Thoroughbred horse business between Central Kentucky and the Ashland area, home of a pioneering track, Raceland.

Secretariat rocketed to victory in the 1973 Kentucky Derby. (Photo from Churchilldowns.com)

Secretariat rocketed to victory in the 1973 Kentucky Derby. (Photo from Churchilldowns.com)

The early ’70s were my introduction to horse racing, and it all came through my watching the Triple Crown races on TV; I never made it to a racetrack til I was in college. Canonero II’s upset victory in 1971 taught me that a longshot could win. I don’t remember much about Riva Ridge’s victory in 1972, but by the time the 1973 Triple Crown season rolled around, I was old enough to get caught up in the media frenzy that was Secretariat, and by the end of that season, I was a lifelong racing fan.

Little did I know in 1973, as Secretariat rocketed to victories in the Derby and Preakness so fast that everyone wondered if he could really run a mile and a half at the Belmont, that in 1988, Secretariat would be bred to Tom Gentry’s great broodmare Crimson Saint or that the offspring of that mating would change my life.

By 1990, the filly (later named Navajo Pass) was being sold as a yearling at Keeneland, by Tom Gentry, whom I represented in his famous Chapter 11 bankruptcy. My future law partner, Joe Johnson, represented a lienholder with an interest in the filly. I had known Joe before this, but not well; like everyone, I knew him by reputation if nothing else. He’d been Fayette County judge, and a reformer in a time that might not have been ready for reform. He’d just run for governor and founded the Kentucky Training Center and the Kensington Sales Co.

In our negotiations over the lien, Joe and I became good friends, to the point that if Tom and I were in court, Joe would come sit beside me at the counsel table, mumbling advice. Joe and Tom were both larger than life figures at that point, and it was a heady time for a young lawyer. After Tom’s case was over, and I left the law firm with which I practiced, Joe and I went into practice together, where we remained until his retirement.

— There’s more. Click here to keep reading.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 

To read more of Robert Treadway’s columns on KyForward, click here.


Related Posts

2 Comments

  1. Judge Lloyd K. Rogers says:

    Bill: Massie asking for a recorded vote is so the public knows where their Congressman stands on issues. Bill, you say the Congressmen are too busy so voice votes are good to hurry up the chamber’s actions because the Congressmen are too busy. I have been on capital hill and watched these ” busy” Congressmen hurrying to the cocktail parties of the lobbyists. This is hatchet job on Massie!

    • Judy Clabes says:

      Lloyd — I think you might have meant this to be posted to Bill Straub’s column. I am not able to change your Facebook post. Do you want to try by calling up the Straub column and re-posting your comment there???

Leave a Comment